Tuesday, 2 February 2021

Kaldheim: Tergrid's Terrifying Turnaround

 Last week the new viking-themed set for Magic the Gathering—Kaldheim—released on Arena. The set features a host of fun mechanics for players to build decks around, including new options Foretell and Boast, and as always with the first couple of weeks post-release everyone is brewing some premium jank right now. Five Colour God Tribal, Izzet Giants, Orzhov Angels—right now the meta is shifting more than Kaldheim’s changelings, which is the perfect time to try out some funky combos.

With everyone’s attention focused on Tibalt’s Trickery at the moment though, some cards are flying under the radar. One of those cards is Tergrid, God of Fright. A double-sided creature/artifact, Tergrid’s ability to steal your opponent’s cards and her mono black colour scheme fit nicely into a bunch of deck combos. In the interest of science, we tried out a few of these to see where Tergrid best fits to get the most out of her and yoink as much as possible.


Attempt #1: Tergrid’s Army (Orzhov)

Our first attempt to throw Tergrid into a deck didn’t go too badly. The idea was to get out Tergrid and Doom Foretold, then keep sacrificing our Reassembling Skeleton to keep Doom Foretold going. Tergrid would grab anything Doom Foretold removed, and the board state would slowly tilt in our favour as we used their own stuff against them.


(Higher resolution deck image here)


As with most black decks, Thoughtseize was an obvious choice to add—even more so because of Tergrid’s ability applying to both discarded and sacrificed permanents (worth noting lands also fall under her ability!). Seal Away and Birth of Meletis provide some early game defence against aggro decks, while Blood on the Snow works as a last resort wipe card (with one returned creature courtesy of snow lands) if things aren’t going our way.


Initially Pharika’s Libation, Elspeth’s Nightmare, and Cruel Reality played a big part in the deck, but they weren’t quick enough to deal with opponents who played multiple threats by turn three so they were cut. Instead, Mythos of Snapdax was added as a bomb for when Tergrid is in play (to accompany our other bombs Valki and Kaya). 


Kaya fits into the deck easily, returned sacrificed creatures to our hand and giving us some removal potential even before her ultimate. But Valki/Tibalt is the rogue choice of the deck. Played as a creature Valki works as a discard-but-not-really for a creature of our choice, but with Blightstep Pathways and Savai Triomes letting us splash red, we can throw out Tibalt in the late game to really amp up pressure on our opponent.


A lot of the issues with this deck came from having to work around an inconsistent mana base. For people with more Isolated Chapels and Brightclimb Pathways this shouldn’t be an issue, though.


Attempt #2: Golgargrid (Golgari)

Oh man, the less said about this one the better. The idea was to use green to ramp up into a high mana base, get Tergrid into play, and throw out Torment of Hailfire to end the game. Super simple combo that didn’t rely on much at all, so it should have been an easy win.


Not a chance. The deck suffered massively against aggro decks—lacking enough early game threat removal—and lifegain decks, who could just absorb the damage from Torment of Hailfire no problem.


A concept to revisit, but not one we could get working in the time we had.


Attempt #3: Tergrixis (Grixis)

What were we thinking throwing Tergrid into a Grixis shell? Well, after the disaster of Golgargrid we adopted the philosophy of throwing anything we could at her and seeing what stuck.


(Higher resolution deck image here)


Ironically, it worked pretty well! With zero consistency, but plenty of removal and a number of threats other than Tergrid for opponents to worry about, this deck had a reasonably good win rate.


The downside? It was essentially a Grixis planeswalkers deck with Tergrid thrown in. Most of the wins weren’t due to her, and her ability rarely came into play (with all the discard and sac cards being used before she was on the field).


Attempt #4: Cruel Fear (Mono Black)

Unsurprisingly, this was the absolute best deck for Tergrid. A ridiculously high win rate in play queue (averaging 75-100%), with Tergrid earning most of the wins herself. The downside here is that in ranked it initially performed terribly, with constant mana floods and no answers to aggro decks. With that in mind we tweaked it slightly into its final form, which has performed quite well.


(Higher resolution deck image here)

Most of the cards in the deck make use of early game discards, with Waste Not capitalising to give a boost into the mid-game. Once Tergrid is out the value of every card skyrockets, with even Plaguecrafter able to shift the balance in our favour. All in all this was the most synergised deck for Tergrid, and the most fun to play. If you’ve been playing Kaldheim looking to use her, this is the best place for Tergrid to go.




Thursday, 26 November 2020

Crusader Kings III: Build a Bourbon

 The latest update for Crusader Kings III contains a huge number of quality of life changes to the medieval grand strategy game. From bug fixes, to modifications to AI behaviour, to new events, art, and game rules, the 1.2 Argent patch follows Paradox’s design philosophy of consistent ongoing development after a game’s release. Often associated with the high number of DLC expansions released for Paradox’s grand strategy collection, this philosophy has also encompassed free content released alongside paid DLC. 

The biggest update with the Argent patch to Crusader Kings III is a product of this philosophy. Previously Paradox restricted character customisation to just those who purchased paid DLC for Crusader Kings II, which was received negatively by fans. There is a common theme of disappointment that Paradox restricted the feature from players in the Steam reviews for the DLC. Many criticised the feature not being included for free in the base game, and others were dissatisfied with the implementation of a points allocation system to balance created characters. Each customisable option was assigned points, representing years of your character’s life, with beneficial traits aging your custom character and detrimental traits decreasing your character’s age. Paradox seemed to learn from these mistakes when they came to release a similar feature for Europa Universalis IV, the nation designer, which was bundled with the El Dorado DLC and included difficulty settings to adjust the points limit on created nations. Now, with Crusader Kings III, Paradox has released the Ruler Designer feature as a free content update for the game.


The ‘Dev Diaries’ Paradox regularly release show that these two criticisms were important for the team creating the new game’s Ruler Designer. Prior to the game’s release Paradox promised that the feature would be included as a free update, and in the lead up to the Argent patch an overhaul of the points system was announced to remove previous restrictions in light of the ‘free and open approach’ Paradox decided upon for the system. While in its predecessor the points limit was a hard cap preventing the creation of characters with too many points allocated, in Crusader Kings III, they instead act as a soft cap which can be exceeded at the cost of the ability to obtain achievements for the game. The points themselves are no longer directly tied to your character’s age (though changing your character's age can be done with points), but instead much like with Europa Universalis IV operate as an independent system.



The Ruler Designer itself is an upgrade from its Crusader Kings II counterpart in many ways, though most of the improvements come from changes to the character mechanics of Crusader Kings III itself compared to Crusader Kings II. Character sexuality is one such mechanic now with its own category in the Ruler Designer, replacing the singular Homosexual trait from the old game, while traits themselves have been broken up into categories - Education, Personality, and Other Traits. Starting the game married costs you no points, and starting the game with an heir costs so little as to almost be free. Names, coats of arms, faiths, sexuality, and appearance can all be randomised, and with the exception of coats of arms can be manually altered.


However the biggest change compared with the old Ruler Designer comes from the appearance customiser. There are hundreds of options for customising your new character’s appearance in Crusader Kings III’s Ruler Designer, compared to the rather restricted pool of options in Crusader Kings II. The system is far more open, with many of the pre-made choices from the old game replaced with sliders. Some players will doubtless be lost for hours making the perfect ruler only for them to die five minutes into the playthrough, and Paradox has included a new mechanic for ensuring character appearances you’re proud of can be replicated. A character’s DNA, a code representing every aspect of their appearance, can now be copied and pasted into the Ruler Designer. Not only can players now reuse appearances they enjoyed from the past, but they can share these DNA codes so other players can use the same appearances.


Despite these improvements some features present in the old Ruler Designer, such as customisable dynastic heraldry, have yet to be implemented. According to a prior dev diary, the decision was made to ensure the mechanic was released ‘in a timely fashion’ while being ‘functional and fun’. Overall however the centerpiece of Crusader Kings III’s first major content update is a worthy successor. Paradox has acted upon the criticism received in the past, and while some elements have yet to be implemented the prioritisation of the ‘core aspects’ of the Ruler Designer promised to players by the dev team has led to impressive results.


The full patch notes for 1.2 Argent can be found here.



Chris Jackson is a postgraduate historian from the United Kingdom and lifelong video game lover. He went to university to do two degrees in History not because it was a viable career path but because he was inspired by Civilization III as a child to conquer the world (at least virtually). His favourite games at the moment are Magic Arena and Crusader Kings III, and while his CV describes him as a bartender, his current job title is really Dungeon Master for his five ongoing Dungeons & Dragons campaigns.

Tuesday, 24 November 2020

Magic Arena: Why I Quit Standard and Started Playing Historic

I was first introduced to Magic the Gathering by a friend in 2013. He’d been involved with the game for years, and suggested the Duels of the Planeswalkers franchise on Steam as something we could play together since we lived in different cities. In my first game, he utterly crushed me; never had I been so completely outplayed in a video game before - but I was hooked. Nobody else I knew wanted to play, so for the most part I played alone against the DotP AI. When Duels of the Planeswalkers 2014 released, I bought it immediately, and again for the 2015 game. I convinced other friends of mine to play, and got good enough most of the time I’d win.


When Magic Duels released in place of Duels of the Planeswalkers 2016 as a free to play game, I gave it a shot but wasn’t sold, still enraptured by previous games and at the same time breaking into a short but costly stint on Magic the Gathering Online. Not once have I ever played paper MTG, because I enjoyed being able to play in short bursts at absurd hours between work projects, but the virtual card game has been a constant presence in my life since 2013, even if I still stuck to the familiar old DotP games.


I was, then, excited but trepidatious when Magic Arena was announced by Wizards of the Coast. I joined the beta, and played a bit, but couldn’t convert my friends over to the game so returned to the DotP franchise once more. Eventually, those friends moved away from MTG, and I returned to Arena to give it another shot with Theros: Beyond Death. Once more, I was hooked. The limit on rewards was infuriating, but for the first time I was enjoying going against other players online with my off meta Black and White life gain deck. The animations were flashy, the mechanics were relatively smooth, and using cards I’d never seen before, especially planeswalker cards, was incredible fun.


Since the start of the British national lockdown in March I have been playing Arena every day. Initially I wasn’t winning a lot, but I was learning and having fun. I’d browse the subreddit or read articles between games on how things I’d never dealt with before, like drafting, worked. Eventually I branched out from my life gain deck into all different colour combinations and deck archetypes, enjoying them all for the different experiences of MTG they brought me. When the Core 2021 set released, I invested in decks built around the card Ugin, the Spirit Dragon. Everyone online was saying he would be vital to the new meta, and I was looking to get wins more consistently to build my collection up.


It worked. I would win the majority of my games, at the cost of somewhat repetitive gameplay, and slowly I branched into variations of the deck which saw less consistent wins but were a lot more fun to play.


At the end of September, Zendikar Rising released and the majority of previous sets rotated out of the Standard format to become unplayable. My favourite deck became unplayable, and I like everyone else was forced to build new decks from a vastly restricted pool of cards.


With the restricted card pool the opportunities for the playerbase to build interesting, noncompetitive decks was substantially diminished. There were far fewer archetypes to build decks around, which led to a lot of repetitiveness in games and a renewed emphasis on building the most competitive, rather than the most interesting, decks.


Until this point, I had never played a game of Historic. The format was intimidating, with a huge card pool I was locked out of due to having not already invested in it and a reputation for an incredibly high power level. Winning games in Arena only rewards cards and packs from the Standard format, so the majority of cards are inaccessible to players unless they dedicate to a draft or to buying packs from Historic sets. 


After a month of post-rotation Standard, however, I was ready to jump into Historic. Standard seemed to have stagnated, with the high power cards like Omnath from Zendikar Rising banned and the meta settled into the same three or four deck archetypes. But more so, I was nostalgic for my old pre-rotation deck, a three colour Sultai (Green, Black, and Blue) deck I affectionately named YOLO. So without having bought a single pack or drafted a single card from pre-Core 2020 (the earliest Standard set from the last rotation), I launched into Historic. It’s the best decision I have made in my MTG journey.


Suddenly I was back to where I had been when I first rejoined Arena. My deck, which had previously been reasonably good, was losing to a huge variety of decks and cards I’d never seen before. The overpowered deck archetypes I’d so feared rarely appeared, and players were primarily running strange decks with obscure win conditions rather than highly competitive top tier cards. The whole experience was educational, and exhilarating. I spent all my in-game currency on packs for some of the older sets, used my Wildcards to fill in the gaps on a couple of fully Historic decks I wanted to try out, and went from there. 


I haven’t gone back to Standard, and have converted my Standard-playing friends into switching over to Historic too. The sheer variety of options in Historic makes for an endlessly rewarding and infinitely replayable experience. You’re unlikely to go against the same deck often, and very likely to pick up any number of new tricks and combos you never even considered just by facing opponents using them.


Despite all my loving praise for Historic, as well as my encouragement for anyone who feels tempted to try it out, Wizards of the Coast should be offering improvements to make the format more accessible. In the long run, it’s profitable for them. 


First, it should be clearer to players that you can play Historic casually, and not just the Historic Ranked option which is listed separately. Often people criticise that changing modes isn’t easy, which is rather infuriating as all you need to do is launch the Play queue with a Historic deck selected. Any kind of alert, even a loading screen tip like is used for many other basic aspects of the game, would solve this problem.



Second, the apprehension I felt about playing Historic is one shared by many Standard players. Wizards of the Coast could easily resolve this by offering a number of one time deals on Historic packs, similar to the bundles they release associated with each set, or to the Welcome Bundle they offer on the store. This would give players a starting pool of Historic cards, encouraging them to try the format and stay playing it.


Ultimately, Wizards of the Coast makes most of its money from MTG selling packs for the Standard format, so it isn’t surprising Historic has taken a backseat in its priorities. It is strange, however, for them to minimise such a potentially lucrative and enjoyable format. Wizards of the Coast have released Historic content in the form of the Amonkhet Remastered and Kaladesh Remastered sets, and the Historic Anthologies available for a limited time in the store, however these primarily appeal to existing players rather than attracting new players or Standard players to the format. Hopefully, the future will see the company look to utilising Historic in its business model more, which would translate into an even better experience for players.



Chris Jackson is a postgraduate historian from the United Kingdom and lifelong video game lover. He went to university to do two degrees in History not because it was a viable career path but because he was inspired by Civilization III as a child to conquer the world (at least virtually). His favourite games at the moment are Magic Arena and Crusader Kings III, and while his CV describes him as a bartender, his current job title is really Dungeon Master for his five ongoing Dungeons & Dragons campaigns.

Tuesday, 13 October 2020

European League - Stage 2 - Playday 7 - Round Overviews


This post contains all the round overviews from Playday 7 of the European League. The matches today confirmed the relegation of Chaos Esports Club from Tier 1.


MAP  - Oregon

Team Empire 0 - 7 Team Vitality

Empire forced to forfeit due to technical issues



MAP  - Oregon

Virtus Pro 6 - 6 Team Secret

OPERATOR BANS

Thatcher

Montagne


Clash

Goyo

Secret Defense/VP Attack

ROUND

WINNER

SITE

PLANT

NOTES

1

Secret

Laundry/Supply

x

Youtube

2

Secret

Dorms

x

Youtube

3

VP

Kitchen/Dining

m1lon

Youtube

4

Secret

Laundry/Supply

x

Youtube

5

Secret

Dorms

x

Youtube

6

Secret

Kitchen/Dining

x

Youtube

Team Secret 5 - 1 Virtus Pro

Sides swap - Secret Attack/VP Defense

7

VP

Laundry/Supply

x

Youtube

8

VP

Dorms

x

Youtube

9

VP

Kitchen/Dining

Pacbull

wTg disable

Youtube

10

VP

Laundry/Supply

x

Youtube

11

Secret

Dorms

x

Youtube

12

VP

Dorms

x

Youtube

Team Secret  1 - 5 Virtus Pro

Team Secret and Virtus Pro Draw on Oregon 6-6



MAP  - Kafe Dostoyevsky

Natus Vincere 7 - 4 Team BDS

OPERATOR BANS

Thatcher

Hibana


Valkyrie

Wamai

BDS Defense/NaVi Attack

ROUND

WINNER

SITE

PLANT

NOTES

1

BDS

Kitchen

x

Youtube

2

BDS

Bar/Cocktail

x

Youtube

3

NaVi

Fireplace/Mining

x

Flawless NaVi

Youtube

4

NaVi

Kitchen

Kendrew

Youtube

5

NaVi

Bar/Cocktail

Kendrew

Youtube

6

BDS

Reading/Fireplace

x

Youtube

BDS 3 - 3 NaVi

Sides swap - BDS Attack/NaVi Defense

7

NaVi

Kitchen

x

Youtube

8

NaVi

Bar/Cocktail

x

Youtube

9

NaVi

Reading/Fireplace

x

Youtube

10

BDS

Kitchen

BriD

Youtube

11

NaVi

Bar/Cocktail

x

Youtube

BDS 1 - 4 NaVi

Natus Vincere Win Kafe Dostoyevsky 7-4



MAP  - Theme Park

Tempra 7 - 4 Rogue

OPERATOR BANS

Ace

Maverick


Mira

Melusi

Rogue Defense/Tempra Attack

ROUND

WINNER

SITE

PLANT

NOTES

1

Rogue

Bunk/Day Care

Dirza

korey Disable

Youtube

2

Rogue

Armory/Throne

x

Youtube

3

Rogue

Initiation/Office

x

Youtube

4

Tempra

Bunk/Day Care

x

Youtube

5

Tempra

Armory/Throne

Shiinka

Youtube

6

Tempra

Bunk/Day Care

x

Youtube

Rogue 3 - 3 Tempra

Sides swap - Rogue Attack/Tempra Defense

7

Rogue

Armory/Throne

x

Youtube

8

Tempra

Bunk/Day Care

x

Youtube

9

Tempra

Initiation/Office

x

Youtube

10

Tempra

Lab/Storage

x

Youtube

11

Tempra

Bunk/ Day Care

x

Youtube

Rogue 1- 4 Tempra

Tempra Win Theme Park 7-4



MAP  - Theme Park 

G2 7 - 3 Chaos

OPERATOR BANS

Maverick

Montagne


Mira

Clash

G2 Defense/Chaos Attack

ROUND

WINNER

SITE

PLANT

NOTES

1

G2

Armory/Throne

x

Youtube

2

G2

Lab/Storage

x

Youtube

3

G2

Bunk/Day Care

x

Youtube

4

G2

Armory/Throne

x

Youtube

5

Chaos

Lab/Storage

x

Youtube

6

Chaos

Bunk/Day Care

x

Youtube

G2 4 - 2 Chaos

Sides swap - G2 Attack/Chaos Defense

7

Chaos

Bunk/Day Care

x

Youtube

8

G2

Initiation/Office

x

Flawless G2

Youtube

9

G2

Armory/Throne

x

Youtube

10

G2

Lab/Storage

x

Youtube

G2 3 - 1 Chaos

G2 Win Theme Park 7-3


Eloise Evans is an undergraduate student from the United Kingdom. Her love of games stems from the frustration she experienced playing various Red Alert games when she was young. Since then she has developed a particular love of the Elder Scrolls games and the Fallout series. At the moment she is playing a lot of Rainbow Six Siege and Sea of Thieves - arguably too much.